As you all know, from the 5th of April, the site remains closed, and re-show, this time with a new energy bill, what we say is true.
This new bill, it's from April 10 until May 12, 2010.
How can it be that with the enclosed and without consuming virtually nothing has a bill of more than 200 €?
For those who still think that the owner is right, one more proof that shows otherwise.
So I do not think more tests are needed to show what we are saying ... Rent receipts, consumption of light, not blamed failures, etc ...
Two years and six months by paying their light, that is:
30 months X 220 € approx. = € 6,600 that we paid to light.
30 months x 500 € = 15,000 € rental that says it has collected.
His earnings for the local rental amount to € 21,600 in two years and six months.
A man who until recently published that had no income.
A man who wanted to double the monthly for rent.
A man who does not pay a single euro of light.
as a man who does not want responsibility for a breakdown, sort the outage.
And yet he dares to defend that position?
And still dares to say, with all these tests have not paid their monthly payments?
And still there are people who, after all this, I think?
